Institutions | About Us | Help | Gaeilge
rian logo

Go Back
Is there a Cross Listing Premium for Non-Exchange Traded Depositary Receipts?
O'Connor, Thomas G.
In this paper, I examine the valuation effects of trading in the U.S. as non-exchange issues i.e. Level 1 and 144 firms for non-U.S. firms. The study is motivated by two facts; first, while the number of new Level 2/3 issues has fallen 2001, Level 1 issues have remained an attractive listing option for non-U.S. firms. Second, while on theoretical grounds, firms from low-disclosure regimes have most to gain from exchange listing; these firms tend to list in the U.S. as non-exchange issues. Here, I examine whether the continuing attractiveness of, and the tendency of firms to choose a Level 1/144a listing is value enhancing. My results suggest that the tendency on the part of firms from lowdisclosure regimes to choose non-exchange issues is justified. Relative to their highdisclosure peers, these firms tend to gain most from trading in the U.S. However, for Rule 144a issues, the valuation gains are short-lived.
Keyword(s): Economics, Finance & Accounting; Cross listing; Level 1; Rule 144a; Tobin’s q
Publication Date:
Type: Journal article
Peer-Reviewed: Yes
Institution: Maynooth University
Citation(s): O'Connor, Thomas G. (2009) Is there a Cross Listing Premium for Non-Exchange Traded Depositary Receipts? International Research Journal of Finance and Economics (25). pp. 183-202. ISSN 1450-2887
Publisher(s): European Journals, Inc.
File Format(s): application/pdf
Related Link(s):
First Indexed: 2020-01-31 06:35:34 Last Updated: 2020-04-02 07:29:36